crazypaster.blogg.se

Prime95 vs intel burn test
Prime95 vs intel burn test









prime95 vs intel burn test
  1. Prime95 vs intel burn test how to#
  2. Prime95 vs intel burn test full#

However, almost nothing at all will ever reach IBT levels. Some applications such as games with substantial amounts of software physics may reach Prime95 load levels. This means that IBT may fail on commercial CPUs that are running at stock settings simply because Intel doesn't test them to that extent. Unfortunately, the Linpack benchmark was designed for supercomputers (hence the floating point part, for modeling continuous phenomenon) so it really pushes desktops to the limit, far beyond what any application will do. IBT will easily drive load temps up to 20 degrees higher than Prime95, this is well known and is a defining feature of the program.

Prime95 vs intel burn test how to#

IBT is generally regarded as being far more aggressive in the short term, which makes it great for testing ultimate stability. I will try to research more on how to use the prime95 tool, it was more complicated than the intel burn test.

prime95 vs intel burn test

They are different in that IBT uses Linpack (solving linear equations) while Prime95 calculates Mersene Primes. I run it for 8+ hours overnight, and then I know it's stableĪs long as it's not throwing up errors whilst your testing, you should be happy.īoth IBT and Prime95 are similar in that they stress floating point arithmetic and memory subsystems. Sitten taas Prime95:ll (versio 26. if ur system is stable with prime 95 at least 24 hours its perfectly stable system for general use.

Prime95 vs intel burn test full#

Personally I use Prime 95, and small ffts only (this will stress only CPU and cache) the blend test won't get it to full load. where as prime 95 doenn't give the processor that pressure. GPU Memtest : A GPU memory memtest based on CUDA. GPU 3D : OCCT GPU, a home-made 3d program that will make your GPU hotter than anything else (even furmark), and sports an error-checking mode just as ATITool. Each poster will have a preference but they both do the same thing - put your CPU under full load to test for stability. Linpack : The very same test that Intel Burn Test, based on an Intel library, that will make your CPU hotter than never before. Well, different horses for different courses. Will any application ever exceed the stress put under it by prime95? If so, will it ever reach the levels of intelburntest? As I'm not willing to overclock more if it's likely that it will reach similar temperatures to the IBT ones. IntelBurnTest pushes temperatures around 83 degrees doing 20 runs of a high stress test, and after an hour, Prime95 gets temps around 67 degrees on the blend test. I'm currently OCed at 4.2GHz (1.18v Core Voltage) on my 4670k, and I've tried running both programs. I was wondering on the difference between intelburntest and prime95 for stress testing. I use Prime95 I feel its a program to find prime numbers and test my CPU at the same time, so it should work fine.











Prime95 vs intel burn test